It is legal to award government acquisitions, leases, works or services by direct award or limited invitation, but it is not legitimate to use this contractual channel to spend more than 200 billion pesos in 6 months, or 46% of what was spent on contracts from January to July 2014, These figures should only be justified in very exceptional cases. However, it may happen that a certain act or behavior is outside the confines of the legal system when we talk about illegality. On many occasions, however, we find that laws do not apply equally to everyone or directly ignore the fundamental rights of citizens. In this way, we can perceive that the legal sometimes ignores the just. Therefore, we can sometimes ask ourselves: are laws always legitimate? Is the reverse possible? What is legal and what is legitimate? To dispel this doubt, you will find in this article the 8 differences between legal and legitimate. In general, the law attempts to ensure healthy coexistence and claims to be based on morality and precedent, although this is not determinative. For something to be legal, it is sufficient for the legislator to decide to authorize it regardless of its purpose, since it is a purely legal term. We have already seen in the legitimate definition or legal sense that the meanings around this concept are not limited to mere legality. Underneath the concept of legitimacy lies the idea that something is not only legal, but that there is justice and reason in the execution of a particular action. Legitimacy does not come from a legislative institution, but from the acceptance and consensus of the Community for such measures. Legitimacy confers authority and allows respect for the action, norm or situation considered as such. Otherwise, it presupposes the existence of usury and a situation in which society tends to rebel, to create reactance and, in many cases, to provoke the proposal of new laws that change the legal situation. Perhaps, first of all, the answer must be distinguished between the legal and the legitimate, the law adheres to the law, is within a legal framework, limits us to what can or cannot be done from the point of view of law.

Legitimate also means following a correct, just, authentic, moral and ethical path. The legitimate is symbolized by what is obtained with justice, what is gained, the legal can rather be symbolized by an official seal. This is an aspect where the legal and legitimate aspects also differ: if the legal is considered unjust, it will tend to generate reactance, while the legitimate generally does not, or at least not to the same extent, since it is considered fair. The illegal is that which violates legality, whether it is the law or the principle of legality itself. But beware, not all illegal acts will be punished criminally. There are acts that violate criminal law, but there can also be acts that violate labour law, civil law, administrative law, etc. In the field of law, there are concepts that resemble those of non-experts in the field and can even be confused, but they are not really the same. This happens, for example, with legal and legitimate conditions. The various existing laws are constantly created, promulgated, modified and even abolished, according to the dominant ideology and the dominant socio-cultural and historical situations. So what is legal, illegal or illegal is clearly editable, although it is a procedure that can take more or less time. Another difference we can see between legal and legitimate is the extent to which something is considered as such, can vary, or how quickly it does so.

One of the main differences between legal and legitimate lies in its origin. While the law only assumes that an institutional commitment has been made that applies regardless of population, the fact that something is legitimate implies that it is considered fair by the majority. The importance of legitimacy and legality always go hand in hand.